Warning Sign

I woke up sad this morning. The news is grim. Guns and war and greed and fear. In my own little corner of the world, I'm safe and showered with blessings, but paranoia seeps in.

Warning sign, warning sign,
I hear it but I pay no mind.
Hear my voice, hear my voice,
It's saying something and its not very nice.
Pay attention! Pay attention, I'm talking to you and I hope you're concentrating.
I've got money now, I've got money now,
C'mon baby, c'mon baby.

Warning sign of things to come (take it over, take it over)
It happened before, it will happen again.
Hear my voice, move my hair.
I move it around a lot, but I don't care. (what I remember)

Warning sign, warning sign,
Look at my hair, I like the design.
It's the truth, it's the truth.
Your glassy eyes and your open mouth
Take it easy, take it easy,
It's a natural thing and you have to relax,
I've got money now, I've got money now.
C'mon baby, C'mon baby.

Warning sign, of things to come (turn me over, turn me over)
Love is here but I guess it's gone now (hurry up babe,
hurry up babe),
Hear my voice, move my hair.
I move it around a lot, but I don't care what I remember.

Do you remember
What it is that you remember
Baby remember
Baby remember.

Rob Brezsny has a bit from his book Pronoaia next to my horoscope:

SACRED ADVERTISEMENT
When the spell is broken, you will be able to tap into resources you've been cut off from. When the spell is broken, you will finally notice the big, beautiful secrets that have been lying in plain sight. What is that spell? Can you break it yourself?

What is that spell? I blame, I blame the patriarchy.

Al Franken interview on The UpTake

Senator Al Franken answers questions from The UpTake, some serious, some frivolous.
Some highlights: on health care: private insurance needs competition from "a public option" (we know he is a strong advocate for accessible and affordable health care for all).He repeats that he favors gay marriage and thinks DOMA will be history soon. Specifically, he emarks that we just observed the 40th anniversary of Stonewall, and 42nd anniversary of Loving vs. Virginia, saying that 40 years from now, people will find it just as incredible that there was a ban on gay marriage as we do now that there was a ban on interracial marriage. Franken quotes his friend Paul Wellstone: "Politics is not about winning, it's not about power; it's about improving other people's lives."

Progress is too slow, but it is real, and we can't drop the ball because we are impatient with the pace. We need that 60th Senator. We needed those seven months of proving that the election was absolutely clean. We need to make sure that every vote is counted.

The swearing-in is tomorrow (see this Minnesota Independent story). He says it is surreal, after seven months, after watching the coverage on the UpTake; he's pinching himself. I'm elated that he will be in office and ready to work for us; it's about time we had our full representation in the Senate. Looking at the events in Iran and in Honduras makes me grateful, even when I'm feeling cynical about politics in the U.S., because it does make a difference that we have elections, that they can be legal and demonstrably free of corruption, that people can have trust that their voices will be heard by someone whose job it is to represent them.

With Sarah Palin's resignation in Alaska, we see that she and the people who support her are not interested in the actual work of governing, of the hard work of leadership; they are more interested in demagoguery and whipping up fear and resentment to frighten people. I hope that we keep our eye on the incremental changes that are slowly happening in Washington, and keep up the pressure to make those changes bigger and better. When I read the news from Iran and Honduras, I am reminded of a more shameful side of our government's history, when it does not obey its own laws. All the more reason to persist in the often tedious but absolutely necessary work of creating the infrastructure of civial society, such as citizen-journalism of the caliber of the UpTake. I'm going to be making a donation to them, because they need the money. Since our major news outlets can't do the job, we need to make sure it gets done.

What's going on in the MN Legislature?

The UpTake provides an inside view of our legislators at work!

Star Trek analogies!

Late night comedy!

City planners, talk to the geologists!

The Red River is flooding the northwest corner of Minnesota and North Dakota, often called "The Fargo-Moorhead area" because of the two cities across the river not far from each other. But there are many other towns that are threatened by flood-waters, and the Canadians are also in line, because the Red River flows north.

The Big Picture in Boston has some amazing photos of the scene, and there is a map at the U.S.A. article. But for the up-close, personal stories and pictures as well as the eye-witness coverage of the preparations, Bob Collins has been blogging at News Cut on MPR, as well as stacking sand bags.

If you wonder why this area is prone to flooding, this site from North Dakota State University has lots of information on the geology of the area. From Geology Professor Donald P. Schwert of the Department of Geosciences, North Dakota State University, I learned that this area is "the youngest landscape in the contiguous United States" because the glacial lake Agassiz, left behind when the last glacier retreated 12,000 years ago, did not drain until about 9,300 years ago. The rich soil left behind makes it great farmland, but also means that buildings must be built on deep pilings sunk far down into the clay. Tom Cran of MPR interviewed him, and you can listen to the podcast here. The Red River is unique in its situation; it is so young that it has not had time to carve a flood-plain that can store the waters in times of flood, and when the flood comes the waters essentially fill in what was once the bed of the glacial lake Agassiz. John Hockenberry's show The Takeaway on NPR also has a podcast of a conversation with a reporter and Schwert. Here, Schwert sheds more light on why the Red River's flooding is unique.

If you are interested in this geologist's perspective on the issues of planning and mitigation in the area, there is a link on that site to a .pdf document you can download and read. Here are some of my notes on this fascinating document (which you should really read for yourself).

As is the case for New Orleans (floods), San Francisco (earthquakes), and other areas of human habitation in the path of inevitable natural disaster (Pompeii) there are higher risks associated with settlement here than elsewhere. That doesn't mean they can't be anticipated. Erosion, slump, creep and earthflow (technical terms!) are all things that happen in certain areas along the river; experts have written reports on these issues since at least the 70s, and definitely after the big flood of 1997, yet flood management planning is too often trumped by commercial interests.

For example, the river needs to flood, it will flood, so some areas were supposed to be left as parks or parking lots to be floodable "storage areas." But people forgot or ignored this and built dikes to "protect" these areas. Residential development has been allowed in areas that were floodplain storage as recently as 1997. Two recently built low-level bridges act as obstructions for ice-jams. The public is told that all the floods in the Red River Valley are "500 year floods" yet there are no statistics going back more than 100 years, so how would we know that? (Although the author doesn't put it in these words, because there hasn't been public education on the geology of the area, residents and planners have ignored the evidence of their history and of science in their management of the land).

The author's conclusion (which follows specific suggestions for how to plan and mitigate these realities) is

"Cities like Wahpeton-Breckenridge, Fargo-Moorhead, and Grand Forks-East Grand Forks are geologic mistakes – but geographic facts. Given that these cities will never be moved in their entireties, there are still ways of accommodating to the geology and mitigating
the damages induced by flooding and slope failure. However, these require a basic understanding and acceptance of the inevitability of these geologic processes.
In planning, we should not be working toward conserving the past of these cities –instead, through wise planning and land use, we should work toward conserving their futures."

I feel terrible about the people who are working so hard to save their homes. Now isn't really the time for pointing fingers. But after what happened in 1997, why did the states, the regions and local governments not put their heads together with the scientists to come up with a plan? Maybe they did and it was ignored. Scientists do not issue building permits, but they do warn the builders. Too often their warnings are only heard after the flood.

EPIC 2015: future possible?

I went to the Twin Cities Media Alliance public forum today at the Minneapolis Central Library (what a wonderful building!). Matt  showed us a film, EPIC 2015, that he made with Robin Sloan about what could happen to the media. He had a lot of extremely smart things to say on the first panel.