Just why is the Minneapolis Public Library in a financial bind now? and what is the City Council and Mayor's proper role in resolving this situation? Thise two email threads (
here and
here explain the history of some of the funding problems, and give invaluable insight into the politics behind the current struggles over funding.
As usual the STRIB (what a pathetic newspaper) is ignoring the story in favor of the stupid Vikings, so MPR has scooped the "news"paper in its coverage of the impact of Dec 11's budget decision.
An interview on MPR's MidMorning show withMinneapolis Public Library Director
Kit Hadley reveals how the City Council and the Mayor of Minneapolis have not only failed to deliver adequate funding to keep libraries open, but they have effectively sabotaged the Library Board's
attempts to create a reasonable budget for the coming year. Before the City Council meeting, the Library Board had considered three different budget models for dealing with the shortfall, and solicited public input: what was better: maintaining all the branches but with drastically reduced hours and staff? closing three branches and the main library on Mondays? Even more drastic cuts? Public input was in favor of keeping branches open because of their immense value to the neighborhoods they serve, and the Board made a proposal that the City Council's Ways and Means commitee approved, But then on Dec 11, the City Council took back some of the money, making it one time instead of regular funding, and imposing other conditions. It was only at the Dec 11 budget meeting that the Library Board discovered that last minute changes alter their entire budgetary planning options.
Here is an excerpt from
the story accompanying the interview"
(and bravo to Gary Schiff for being the Library defender in this one!)
[City Council member Gary} Schiff says if the goal is to help the Library Board keep all of its branches open, then the city should make a solid financial commitment.
"Because it's ongoing money that is most valuable to our libraries," Schiff said. "Ongoing is the most valuable. So this is not an action that we should be worried (about). Talk about sending messages, this is a blow. This is operating money they use to hire staff and keep buildings open. You don't hire staff with one-time money."
Schiff also argued that the Library Board had already counted on the $250,000 when they made another request for $105,000. Board members said that would guarantee that the three libraries on the chopping block could stay open, albeit at limited hours.
The Council did include the extra $105,000, but they also decided to drop another part of the deal that would have added $925,000 per year to library budgets from 2007 to 2016. A city official says that money is still available, if the board decides to use the $1.2 million to pay down debt as part of a long-term funding plan.
However, this and other changes appeared to take library trustees by surprise. The board had included that $925,000 in its $24.8 million budget.
Library Board President Anita Duckor says she doesn't know if they'll be able to balance their budget, much less be able to use the one-time dollars to keep the three libraries open.
(full story here)confusing? Yeah, but it shouldn't be. This is a lousy way to do business, folks! How is the Library Board supposed to make responsible budgetary decisions when the City Council and the Mayor's office don't make all the information available to them? They know that the Library Board cannot levy taxes and that they are strapped by the cuts in state aid to cities. This email interchange shows that the issue of how the library is funded is complicated, but there are solutions. In fact, the City Charter mandates that the City support the library.
My paranoid view is that I think the city is trying to starve the Library in order to force the Board to close and then sell off buildings, or merge with Hennepin county libraries thus divesting themselves of the responsibility, but also removing one of the city's most precious assets from its control. Rybak and Ostrow in particular look bad here.